[plt-scheme] When does eqv? differ from eq? , from equal?
John Clements
clements at brinckerhoff.org
Mon Oct 6 13:04:26 EDT 2008
On Oct 6, 2008, at 6:15 AM, Alan Watson wrote:
> P.S. If Scheme is defined as "doing the right thing and damning the
> torpedoes", I would assert that eq? should not be part of Scheme
It depends on what torpedoes you're damning. The torpedo of
simplicity? The torpedo of slow execution? The torpedo of "real-world"
nonconformity? (I damn that last torpedo on a daily basis.)
Scheme is hardly the most high-minded language out there: we've got
mutation, a dynamic type system, and a useful module system (ooh,
ouch, sorry).
I also feel the need to note that Farragut isn't actually venerated
for uttering "Damn the torpedoes, Do the Right Thing!" :)
John Clements
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2484 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://list.cs.brown.edu/pipermail/plt-scheme/attachments/20081006/62198db1/smime.bin
More information about the plt-scheme
mailing list