[plt-scheme] V4 request for thoughts on various question
Jens Axel Soegaard
jensaxel at soegaard.net
Mon Aug 4 15:32:06 EDT 2008
Alan Watson wrote:
> Thanks to Robby and Sam for their explanations. Regarding let*,
> §11.4.6 says that "the ⟨init⟩s are evaluated and bindings created
> sequentially from left to right." No room for interleaving there.
If you can prove that interleaving the <init>s give the same result as
when the bindings
are evaluated and created sequentially (e.g. when all <init>s are
without side effects),
then no one would know if you evaluated then in parallel.
--
Jens Axel Søgaard
More information about the plt-scheme
mailing list