[plt-scheme] V4 request for thoughts on various question

Jens Axel Soegaard jensaxel at soegaard.net
Mon Aug 4 15:32:06 EDT 2008


Alan Watson wrote:
> Thanks to Robby and Sam for their explanations. Regarding let*, 
> §11.4.6 says that "the ⟨init⟩s are evaluated and bindings created 
> sequentially from left to right." No room for interleaving there. 

If you can prove that interleaving the <init>s give the same result as 
when the bindings
are evaluated and created sequentially (e.g. when all <init>s are 
without side effects),
then no one would know if you evaluated then in parallel.

-- 
Jens Axel Søgaard




More information about the plt-scheme mailing list