[CI] Paper theme

[Hideaki Kimura]

Right.
CORDS is also different because it has no bucketing and no composite
soft FD. BHUNT has bucketing, but the paper provides no detailed
performance analysis.

Samuel Madden wrote:
> It does look like CORDS is pretty closely related, in the sense that 
> their measure of soft FDs is basically the same as our measure of c_per_u.
> 
> But they don't do any compaction, or show how to use for performance 
> purposes, just query cost estimation.
> 
> 
> -Sam
> 
> On Jun 12, 2008, at 12:44 PM, Hideaki Kimura wrote:
> 
>>> - How does this related to the Graefe paper the reviewers told us about?
>> Do you mean this paper?
>> Patrick E. O'Neil, Goetz Graefe: Multi-Table Joins Through Bitmapped 
>> Join Indices. SIGMOD Record 24(3): 8-11 (1995)
>> -- 
>> Hideaki Kimura <hkimura at cs.brown.edu>
> 

-- 
Hideaki Kimura <hkimura at cs.brown.edu>